I guess I could have illustrated that (adorable) idea a little better, but it counts, right?? ( I am so going to do several backgrounds for this one and additionally flower bouquets that matches omg) And this is also totally a reference to the first Chibi Trekker drawing I did ayy
Wohooo! The boys enjoying a Holo Vid (it’s totally not just a blank screen, trust me) and blinking tiredly, cuddled up with each other :) I love making these tiny animations, though the layer count is getting ridiclous Thank you for your suggestions - I’m always open to more! :D
Today, a man in a comic book store told me that "all that stuff" between Kirk and Spock is fan-insert, not in any way intended by the writers or staff of Star Trek TOS. (Considering I had used the term "bromance", I don't know exactly what he was objecting to.) He also said "the writer" has said nothing like that was ever put in. I feel like this is a subject that's come up before on your blog, but I was wondering if you have any insight you'd like to share?
(a) The phrasing “All that stuff” instantly seems to me to reveal greater or lesser levels of bias-against. (You were there, so you’d be in a better position to judge
than I would.) So anything further from this source ought rightfully to
be subject to greater-than-usual levels of scrutiny.
(b) By “the writer” I assume he means Gene Roddenberry. (While, horrors, possibly not knowing about the existence of other Trek
writers? Not knowing about Gene Coon, or Harlan Ellison, or Dorothy
Fontana, or Ted Sturgeon, or or or…? God, what an arid boring place
such a worldview must be.)
And if he means Roddenberry, then he’s wrong about “fan insert” being the only source of, at the very least, implications of possible love between Kirk and Spock. Pro insert?
That we’ve got. All you need to do is Google around for information
about the term “t’hy’la”, which Roddenberry coined and which appears a
number of times in the novelization of Star Trek: The Motion Picture. This term, which Spock several times uses in the narrative to describe Kirk, is defined as follows by Roddenberry:
The word “t’hy’la“ is Vulcan and means ‘brother’, ‘friend’ and/or ‘lover’.
You
also get kind of a sly “editor’s note” about this term (and I’d give a
pretty to know whether this appears in the first edition or was added
later):
The human concept of friend is most nearly
duplicated in Vulcan thought by the term “t’hy’la”, which can also mean
“brother” and “lover”.
Spock’s recollection (from which this chapter is drawn) is that it was a
most difficult moment for him since he did indeed consider Kirk to have
become his brother. However, because “t’hy’la” can be used to mean
“lover” and since Kirk’s and Spock’s friendship was unusually close,
this has led to some speculation over whether or not they had actually
indeed become lovers. At our request, Admiral Kirk supplied the
following comments on this subject:
“I was never aware of this ‘lovers’ rumor, although I have been told
that Spock encountered it several times. Apparently, he had always
dismissed it with his characteristic lifting of his right eyebrow, which
usually connoted some combination of surprise, disbelief, and/or
annoyance. As for myself… I have always found my best gratification in
that creature called woman. Also, I would not like to be thought of as
being so foolish that I would select a love partner who came into sexual
heat only once every seven years.”
The disclaimer
kind of makes me chuckle, and possibly not for the reasons people might
necessarily expect. (For one thing, it’s interesting for what it doesn’t
say… but let’s put that aside for the moment.) Most important to note
here is that there was probably never a Trek book that was as closely
vetted by Gene and his office as that one, and if something appeared in
it, then either Gene or Paramount meant it to be there.
The
corporate side of Paramount was an extremely buttoned-down sort of
place in the 70s and 80s (as, frankly, most media companies were) and
would have been terrified of doing anything that might alienate or freak
out their viewers / readers. And things only normally get worse in such
situations when a fictional property starts to be seen as being worth
serious money… which was what was happening with Trek around then. I
could be wrong — and if anyone has correction for me on this, I
wouldn’t be surprised — but it seems likely to me that Star Trek was
the first really visible TV property to be resurrected as a feature film
with a serious budget. (If not the first such TV property to be so
resurrected, period.) Suddenly here was this long-deceased series coming
back as a movie, suddenly here was a serious director at the helm in
David Wise, and Isaac Asimov, God rest him, brought on as science
advisor… and behold, the smell of money was in the air.
At such times the parent company tends to become terrified of doing anything, or
allowing anything to happen, that might possibly screw things up. And whatever might
have been going on in Gene’s head as regarded his real feelings about
Kirk and Spock being More Than Just Good Friends, he was enough of a
producer and aware enough of how things worked in the real world of film
production and its attendant publicity that — for public consumption
— he was going to have to either deny the possibility outright, or be
publicly ambivalent.
Straightforward denial on “Kirk’s” part here
would have been simple enough. And I’m sure I remember anecdotal
mentions about Gene laughing the concept off at one convention or
another when the subject came up. But the one print declaration we’ve
got is what you see above, and the ambivalence strikes me as both funny
and transparent in terms of its attempt to conceal an opinion that
Paramount (or was it Gulf + Western then? I lose track.*) would not have
approved of and which Gene, if wise, would never publicly confirm.
Inside
his head, though… I may be from Long Island but I am not a medium, so
I do not have current access to the only being who would know for sure. Yet
at the same time, you want to examine the evidence. Here we have a man
who campaigned hard with the network to have an alien first officer
(even though the Network freaked so badly over his “satanic” appearance
that they airbrushed his ears round in the promotional material for the
affiliates): who would have had a woman first officer if things had gone
differently: who wanted a racially diverse crew: who went out of his
way to include nationalities (like Russians) that the US had recently
been on the outs with: who set up and saw through to film the first
interracial TV kiss. Roddenberry was routinely ahead of his time on
issues like these. It would not surprise me in the slightest to
discover he’d at least entertained thoughts like this for two of his
three leads, who from first to last we are shown as partners in a truly
extraordinary friendship.
Now, that said — The inside of the
Great Bird’s head was one thing. But if even Gene was being cautious,
you may imagine that elsewhere in the Franchise, the concept of saying
anything in the clear about the, um, nuts and bolts of a possible
t’hy’la relationship between Kirk and Spock, was not kindly received by
TPTB. Writers who attempted such — or at least, failed to get away with
it — were shown the door at Pocket Books and emphatically invited not
to darken it again. About “fan insert” outside of the professionally
published books, I know what any moderately well-read fanzine fan of the
70s and 80s and 90s knows: that it was rampant, and Paramount knew
about it, and it was winked at.
More than this, respondent saith
not. The jury would probably have to be out permanently on this issue
(meaning auctorial intent. But wait a minute: we’re concerned about this
why? I thought The Author was Dead.) :) …In any case, for us at this
end of time, all the “hard” evidence is and must remain ambivalent. But then, things being as
they were, how could it be otherwise…?
*A lot of the Trek
novelists and editors during that period used to call it “Engulf +
Devour.” This would have been before Viacom, which did its own engulfing
+ devouring on Paramount.
Hahaha I get this ask almost weekly now (almost as frequently as “but what does Spock’s dick really look like though???”) and it always makes me giggle. And yes, it is a tale as old as time. But that’s okay – I certainly don’t mind your asking.
I wasn’t around in the olden days of yore so I can’t tell you why it never caught on (maybe someone else on here knows???) but my guess would be the fandom decided to go with Spirk for the exact reason that it is less… explicit? I mean… the 60′s were a different time, friend. An EXTREMELY homophobic time.
And at this point we’re all old and set in our ways and we’re not gonna change. Everyone calls it Spirk or Kirk/Spock, or sometimes just KS for short.
Btw, if anyone doesn’t know: the use of the “/” aka “slash” was originated by Kirk/Spock shippers. In fact, the entire modern day concept of “shipping” and “slash” fanfiction was originated by Spirk writers and Trekkies.
While I’ve never really been part of the fanfic community (it’s existed on the periphery of my circles for years; kind of impossible to avoid it if you’ve been a Trek fan for long enough), so could very well be wrong, the impression I have simply by dint of having been around for a while is that the tendency to combine names (Spirk, etc.) is relatively recent…probably within the past few decades? At least, every time I ran across it at first it was just “slash” or “K/S”, and I only really remember seeing the name portmanteaus fairly recently.
But keep that disclaimer at the beginning in mind: I’m well aware of fanfic, and greatly enjoy knowing about it/hearing about it/reading about it, but don’t actually get into it myself, so I could very well be talking out of my butt.
And some of the older Trek novels (particularly those by Sondra Marshak and Myrna Culbreath are so obviously just-barely-cleaned-up-enough-for-mass-publication K/S slash that it’s hilarious (and that’s not meant in a mean way at all).
You are 110% correct. Spirk - along with Space Husbands - became a thing when the fandom moved from livejournal to tumblr, because tumblr does not deal well at all with tags that has a slash in it. Prior to that K/S was by far the most common.
And the reason it became Spirk and not Kock or Spork is most likely that the fandom wanted to keep the ship free of cutlery and random non-K/S related dick pics.
I have a meta not written by me buried somewhere on my blog in the ‘Space Husbands‘ tag if anyone care to go dig for it, personally I’m too lazy.
Reblogging for these perfect additions.
Oh, of COURSE, I should have remembered that. You’re totally right, I don’t remember ever seeing name combinations until Tumblr happened – and that’s exactly why. I’ve seen people occasionally use “kirk x spock” but the creation of combo-names is a far better way to tag on Tumblr. That’s absolutely where “spirk” came from.
I get off on fandom history SO MUCH. love this shit. Not sure if this whole thread is wondering about ‘spirk’ in particular, or about portmanteaus in general, but according to fanlore portmanteaus originated in some creepy ass sounding RPS thing called popslash - I looked it up because i definitely remember portmanteaus being rampant in the Buffy fandom at least as early as 2003-4 (good GOD I’m old).